a) she runs out of time because of an impossible deadline or
b) she nears her page limit and has to rush the ending to finish the book.
I have to wonder if it might have turned out better if the author had written the ending first and then went back and built the story up to it. I did this with my second manuscript. The black moment came to me first and I wrote the whole book around it. It was a pretty darn good book too, if I do say so myself. It got me an agent. It even got editor interest. Unfortunately, that editor wanted me to reset the majority of the book as a contemporary instead of WWII. Doing that would have required more than changing some dates and the clothes the H&H wore. It would change who the characters were, their conflict, their goals, and that wonderful black moment I had that was the catalyst for the whole book. I did a lot of soul searching on that one. I discussed it with my agent and told him what I thought the change in time period would do to the scope of the book. Though it nearly killed me, I finally decided not to do it. It wouldn’t be the same book without the ending and everything that leads up to it. Did I make the right decision? Who knows? Maybe not since I haven’t sold that book yet. But I do hope that someday the romance market will be ready for a WWII paranormal. And when it is, have I got a story with a killer ending when it does.
And, for your viewing pleasure, a scrumptious ending for the eyes. *G*
I like your suggestion of finding the ending first. I just read a great book about beginnings and the author makes a similar point.
ReplyDeleteDon't second guess yourself, Lori. You did the right thing. Sometimes we have to make hard decisions, but we need to stick to what our gut says.
ReplyDelete~Maggie